Files
Download Full Text (4.9 MB)
Year
1956
Litigants/Parties
Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995
California, defendant
Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant
Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant
Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant
Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant
San Diego (Calif.), defendant
San Diego County (Calif.), defendant
United States, intervener
Nevada, intervener
United States. Supreme Court
New Mexico, party
Utah, party
Keywords
Water rights -- Southwest, New; Water rights -- Southwest, New--Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico) -- Water rights
Recommended Citation
"In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1956, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties: before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: availability of Article III(b) waters for use in California: legislative history of section 4(a) of Boulder Canyon Project Act (limitation provision): bills, amendments, and debates in chronological order: 70th Cong., 1st & 2d Sess. (1927-1928): submitted by the California defendants." (1956). Arizona v. California Collection. 217.
https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/arizona-v-california/217
Note
Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)