In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants.

Contributors

Files

Year

1956

Litigants/Parties

Arizona, complainant
Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995
Brown, Edmund G. (Edmund Gerald), 1905-1996
Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997
McCarty, Robert L
Moore, Prentiss
Nelson, Gilbert F
Corker, Charles E
Friedman, Howard I
Gindler, Burton J
McKenney, James B
Alexander, John R
Wheatley, Charles F
Jenney, Francis E
Lagerlof, Stanley C
Howard, James H
Cooper, Charles C
Keith, Donald M
Hutchinson, H. Kenneth
Doherty, Frank P
Arnebergh, Roger
Tillman, Gilmore
Mathews, John H
Du Paul, J. F
Cosgrove, T. B
Horton, Harry W
Knox, R. L
Redwine, Earl
Keller, James Don
California, defendant
Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant
Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant
Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant
Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant
San Diego (Calif.), defendant
San Diego County (Calif.), defendant
United States, intervener
Nevada, intervener
New Mexico, party
Utah, party
United States. Supreme Court

Keywords

Water rights -- Southwest, New; Water rights -- Southwest, New--Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico) -- Water rights

Note

Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)

Recommended Citation

"In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term, 1955, no. 10 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants : United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, special master: memorandum re rule 43(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "Record of Excluded Evidence" : submitted by the California defendants." (1956). Arizona v. California Collection. 37.
https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/arizona-v-california/37