In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: findings of fact and conclusions of law : in three volumes : volume III : findings and conclusions relating to specific projects, proposed severally by : A. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, for itself and the City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego; B. Palo Verde Irrigation District; C. Coachella Valley County Water District; D. Imperial Irrigation District, accompanied by a brief on behalf of that district.

Contributors

Files

Year

1959

Litigants/Parties

Arizona, complainant
Rifkind, Simon H. (Simon Hirsch), 1901-1995
Mosk, Stanley, 1912-2001
Ely, Northcutt, 1903-1997
Corker, Charles E
Nelson, Gilbert F
Gindler, Burton J
Alexander, John R
Sondheim, Harry B
Codon, Iryne
Moore, Prentiss
McCarty, Robert L
Wheatley, Charles F
Muys, Jerome C
Hufstedler, Shirley M
Jenney, Francis E
Lagerlof, Stanley C
Horton, Harry W
Knox, R. L
Redwine, Earl
Howard, James H
Cooper, Charles C., Jr
Keith, Donald M
Hutchinson, H. Kenneth
Doherty, Frank P
Arnebergh, Roger
Tillman, Gilmore
Mathews, John H
Du Paul, J. F
Keller, James Don
Berrey, Robert G
California, defendant
Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant
Imperial Irrigation District (Calif.), defendant
Coachella Valley County Water District (Calif.), defendant
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Calif.), defendant
Los Angeles (Calif.), defendant
San Diego (Calif.), defendant
San Diego County (Calif.), defendant
United States, intervener
Nevada, intervener
New Mexico, party
Utah, party
United States. Supreme Court

Keywords

Water rights -- Southwest, New; Water rights -- Southwest, New--Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico) -- Water rights

Note

Landmark decision citation: Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)

Recommended Citation

"In the Supreme Court of the United States, October term 1958, no. 9 original : State of Arizona, complainant, vs. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants ; United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners ; State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties : before the Hon. Simon H. Rifkind, Special Master: findings of fact and conclusions of law : in three volumes : volume III : findings and conclusions relating to specific projects, proposed severally by : A. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, for itself and the City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego; B. Palo Verde Irrigation District; C. Coachella Valley County Water District; D. Imperial Irrigation District, accompanied by a brief on behalf of that district." (1959). Arizona v. California Collection. 55.
https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/arizona-v-california/55