Document Type

Article

Publication

Arizona State Law Journal

Year

1977

Abstract

The scope of the general definition of "relevant evidence" in the Federal Rules of Evidence is ambiguous. It is unclear whether Congress, for instance, intended that certain issues be considered legislatively determined or that those issues rest within the discretion of the courts. There is also some uncertainty over the definition's applicability to several types of evidence--particularly undisputed facts such as those that provide background information or are judicially admitted.

Comments

“First published by Arizona State Law Journal, Volume 1977, Issue 2.”

Share

COinS